AI receptionist vendor pricing, screenshotted and dated

Every price this site quotes for another company’s product comes from that company’s own published pricing page, read by a person and captured as an image with the date it was taken. This page is where those captures live. There are 77 vendors in it.

We publish it for two reasons. The first is that a price in a comparison table is a claim, and a dated screenshot is evidence — anyone can check whether we read it correctly. The second is self-interested: we quoted one vendor’s price wrong across six pages once, and the only durable fix was to stop keeping prices in articles and start keeping them in one place with a review date attached.

• 77vendors tracked, across six kinds of product
• 23of them publish no price at all — about 30% of the market
• 77rows backed by a dated screenshot
• Weeklyevery row re-checked each Friday

Vendors change prices without notice and a screenshot ages the moment it is taken, so treat every capture as evidence of what was published on that date and nothing more — check the vendor’s own page before you sign anything. Screenshots are reproduced for factual comparison; each remains the property of the company that published it.

Why the list is alphabetical

Every vendor is listed A to Z, in one flat list, in the same format. No ranking, no tiers, no editorial order — where a company appears is decided by its name and nothing else. Futuro is in the list on the same terms as everyone else. A pricing record is only worth citing if the order it is presented in carries no opinion, and alphabetical is the only order that carries none.

Each row is tagged with what the product actually is, because that part matters and alphabetical order would otherwise hide it: a developer platform charging seven cents a minute is not an alternative to a human answering service charging $250 a month, and mistaking one for the other is the most common way a buyer in this category gets a nasty surprise. The cheap per-minute number usually belongs to something you still have to build. The tag tells you which is which; it does not decide who comes first.

Every entry has its own anchor, so any row can be linked or cited directly — /vendor-pricing#vapi opens on Vapi.

When a vendor publishes no price at all

23 of the 77 vendors here — about 30% — publish no price anywhere on their site. That is itself the most interesting number on this page, and it is the one thing here we can assert without depending on anybody else. It is also useful: a vendor who withholds pricing is almost always sales-led and quote-based, which tells a buyer the evaluation will be slower and the number will depend on who is asking.

For those rows, where one exists, we add a figure from a third-party software directory — Capterra — marked directory source so it is never mistaken for the vendor’s own. 1 row currently carries one. This is the best available record when there is no primary one, not an equal substitute for it: directory pricing is typically supplied by the vendor and is not refreshed on any schedule we control, so it can be stale in a way a live pricing page cannot. Treat it as “what the vendor told a directory,” which is what it is.

What we do not use, in any row: a quote given to us privately, an aggregator’s blog post, or a competitor’s comparison page. If the only available number came from one of those, the row says the vendor does not publish pricing and stops there.